Content

Saint Birgitta

Wednesday, August 26, 2009 0 comments
.
Hello Bishop. This is the first time I'm blogging here. I just want to ask if you ever read the revelations of Saint Birgitta. If so, what is your opinion of them? - Ruben



"There are now three kinds of people among Christians as symbolised by the Hebrews. There are some who really believe in God and in My words. There are others who believe in God but lack confidence in My words, because they do not know how to distinguish between a good and a bad spirit. The third are those who neither believe in Me nor in you to whom I have spoken my words."
.
The above extract from St Birgitta's revelations is easy to understand and accept, albeit superfluous I feel to what already exists in Holy Scripture. My view of her many revelations is, like the revelations of various other religious, they are difficult to form opinions about beyond the fact that they seem to have a relevance today despite having been made centuries ago.
.
Birgitta Birgersdotter (circa 1303 – 23 July 1373) is the most celebrated saint of Sweden. She was the daughter of Birger Persson of the family of Finsta, governor of Uppland, and one of the richest landowners of the country, and his wife who was a member of the Folkunga family. Through her mother, young Birgitta was a relation of the Swedish kings of her lifetime. St Ingrid, whose death had occurred about twenty years before Birgitta's birth, was a near relative of the family. Birger's daughter received a careful religious training, and from her seventh year showed signs of extraordinary religious impressions and illuminations.
.
In 1316, at the age of thirteen, she was united in marriage to Ulf Gudmarsson, who was then eighteen. She acquired great influence over her noble and pious husband, and the happy marriage was blessed with eight children, among them St Catherine of Sweden. The saintly life and the great charity of Birgitta soon made her name known far and wide. She was acquainted with several learned and pious theologians, among them Nicolaus Hermanni, later Bishop of Linköping, Matthias, canon of Linköping, her confessor, Peter, Prior of Alvastrâ, and Peter Magister, her confessor after Matthias. She was later at the court of King Magnus Eriksson, over whom she gradually acquired great influence. Early in the forties (1341 – 1343) in company with her husband she made a pilgrimage to Santiago de Compostella. On the return journey her husband was stricken with an attack of illness, but recovered sufficiently to finish the journey. Shortly afterwards, however, he died (1344) in the Cistercian monastery of Alvastrâ in East Gothland.

Birgitta now devoted herself entirely to practices of religion and asceticism, and to religious undertakings. The visions which she believed herself to have had from her early childhood now became more frequent and definite. She believed that Christ Himself appeared to her, and she wrote down the revelations she then received, which were in great repute during the Middle Ages. They were translated into Latin by Matthias Magister and Prior Peter.
.
St Birgitta now founded a new religious congregation, the Brigittines, or Order of St Saviour, whose chief monastery, at Vadstena, was richly endowed by King Magnus and his queen (1346). To obtain confirmation for her institute, and at the same time to seek a larger sphere of activity for her mission, which was the moral uplifting of the period, she journeyed to Rome in 1349, and remained there until her death, except while absent on pilgrimages, among them one to the Holy Land in 1373. In August, 1370, Pope Urban V confirmed the Rule of her congregation. Birgitta made earnest representations to Pope Urban, urging the removal of the Holy See from Avignon back to Rome. She accomplished the greatest good in Rome, however, by her pious and charitable life, and her earnest admonitions to others to adopt a better life, following out the excellent precedents she had set in her native land. The year following her death her remains were conveyed to the monastery at Vadstena. She was canonised on 7 October, 1391 by Boniface IX, and confirmed by the Council of Constance in 1415.

In 1999 Pope John Paul II named St Birgitta as a patron saint of Europe. Her feast day is celebrated on July 23rd, the day of her death. Her feast was not in the Tridentine Calendar, but was later inserted in the Roman Catholic calendar of saints in 1623 for celebration on October 7th, the day she was canonised by Pope Boniface IX. Five years later, her feast was moved to October 8th, where it remained until the revision of the Roman Catholic Calendar of Saints in 1969. Traditionalists continue to use the earlier calendars.
.
Read more »

Inspiration Story .... beautiful story

Tuesday, August 25, 2009 0 comments
A man came home from work late, tired and irritated, to find his 5-year old son waiting for him at the door.

SON: "Daddy, may I ask you a question?"
DAD: "Yeah sure, what is it?" replied the man.
SON: "Daddy, how much do you make an hour?"
DAD: "That's none of your business. Why do you ask such a thing?" the man said angrily.
SON: "I just want to know. Please tell me, how much do you make an hour?"
DAD: "If you must know, I make Rs.100 an hour."
SON: "Oh," the little boy replied, with his head down.
SON: "Daddy, may I please borrow Rs.50?"

The father was furious, "If the only reason you asked that is so you can borrow some money to buy a silly toy or some other nonsense, then you march yourself straight to your room and go to bed. Think about why you are being so selfish. I work hard everyday for such this childish behavior."

The little boy quietly went to his room and shut the door.
The man sat down and started to get even angrier about the little boy's questions. How dare he ask such questions only to get some money?

After about an hour or so, the man had calmed down, and started to think: Maybe there was something he really needed to buy with that Rs.50 and he really didn't ask for money very often. The man went to the door of the little boy's room and opened the door.

"Are you asleep, son?" He asked.
"No daddy, I'm awake," replied the boy.
"I've been thinking, maybe I was too hard on you earlier" said the man.
"It's been a long day and I took out my aggravation on you. Here's the Rs.50 you asked for."

The little boy sat straight up, smiling. "Oh, thank you daddy!" He yelled. Then, reaching under his pillow he pulled out some crumpled up bills. The man saw that the boy already had money, started to get angry again. The little boy slowly counted out his money, and then looked up at his father.

"Why do you want more money if you already have some?" the father grumbled.
"Because I didn't have enough, but now I do," the little boy replied.
"Daddy, I have Rs.100 now. Can I buy an hour of your time?
Please come home early tomorrow. I would like to have dinner with you."

The father was crushed. He put his arms around his little son, and he begged for his forgiveness.
Read more »

คาถาบูชาเมีย

Monday, August 24, 2009 0 comments


คาถาบูชาเมีย V1
รักเมียต้องให้เมีย ไม่นั้นเมียจะเสียใจ
รักเมียต้องอ่อนไหว เมียว่าไงต้องว่าตาม
รักเมียต้องเคารพ ต้องประจบห้ามลามปาม
รักเมียต้องคอยตาม ไม่วู่วามเอาแต่ใจ
รักเมียต้องอดทน เมียเป็นคนไม่ง้อใคร
รักเมียต้องทำใจ ใช่เมียใครก็เมียเรา
รักเมียต้องรวยรวย เดี๋ยวจะซวยเมียไม่เอา
รักเมียต้องคอยเฝ้า เฝ้าเมียเราเพียงคนเดียว
รักเมียต้องฝึกฝน เมียเป็นคนชอบของใหม่
รักเมียต้องเอาใจ เมียซื้ออะไรอย่าห้ามปราม
รักเมียต้องแข็งแรง ห้ามสาปแช่งให้เมียตาย
รักเมียต้องคล้อยตาม ไม่ซักถามให้กวนใจ
รักเมียต้องกล้าเสีย แค่บอกเมียไม่เป็นไร
รักเมียต้องสนใจ เมียเป็นไงต้องคอยดู
รักเมียต้องพูดง่าย ไม่โวยวายไม่ลบหลู่
รักเมียต้องเฝ้าดู เดี๋ยวชายชู้จะเอาไป
รักเมียต้องเชื่อฟัง เมียเสียงดังต้องทนได้
รักเมียต้องรู้ใจ เมียอยากได้ต้องหามา
รักเมียต้องใจเย็น เมียนั้นเป็นเช่นนางฟ้า
รักเมียต้องบูชา เมียมีค่ากว่าสิ่งใด
รักเมียต้องรักเดียว อย่าไปเที่ยวรักเมียใคร
รักเมียต้องมั่นใจ เมียของใครก็ของมัน
รักเมียต้องแน่วแน่ ต้องรักแท้เมียของฉัน
รักเมียต้องยึดมั่น ทุกข้อนั้นสำคัญเอย...


คาถาบูชาเมีย V2

รักเมีย ต้องอดทน ต้องเป็นคน เคารพเมีย

รักเมีย ต้องส่งเสีย อย่าให้เมีย ต้องเสียใจ

รักเมีย ต้องรักเดียว อย่าได้เที่ยว ไปรักใคร

รักเมีย ต้องทำใจ ถึงอย่างไร เทอก็เมีย

รักเมีย อย่าขี้เหล้า เมียจะเหงา เราจะเสีย

รักเมีย อย่าอ่อนเพลีย คนรักเมีย ต้องแข็งแรง

รักเมีย อย่ารุนแรง ค่อยๆแซง อย่าขับไว

รักเมีย ต้องยอมเมีย เพราะว่าเมีย ไม่ยอมใคร

รักเมีย ต้องเข้าใจ ไม่มีใคร ใหญ่กว่าเมีย

รักเมีย อย่าเกี่ยงเมีย คำพูดเมีย ใหญ่กว่าใคร

ชาติหน้า มีฉันท์ใด จงจำไว้ อย่ามีเมียยยยย
Read more »

เงินเดือน เรื่องตลก

Saturday, August 22, 2009 0 comments

เมื่อวานนี้ ขับรถไปเรียนตอนค่ำๆ ฟังข่าวรับสมัครงาน

งานแรกเจ้าหน้าที่วางแผนบุคลากรของโรงพยาบาลชลบุรี คล้ายๆกับHR วุฒิการศึกษาปริญญาตรีทางด้านบริหาร แต่เป็นลูกจ้างชั่วคราว เป็นเงินของโรงพยาบาลชลบุรี อัตราเงินเดือนประมาณ 5,800บาท

ตำแหน่งต่อมาพนักงานขับรถของหน่วยราชการ ลูกจ้างชั่วคราว วุฒิ ม.3 ขึ้นไปเงินเดือน 6,800บาท


ฟังแล้วก็รู้สึกงงๆ ไม่รู้จะโทรไปถามสถานีวิทยุหรือโทรไปถามโรงพยาบาลดีว่า อยากจะรับนักวางแผนบุคคลที่มีคุณค่าของงานต่ำกว่าคนขับรถหรืออย่างไร


งงว่าจะเรียนกันยากลำบากทำไม จบม.3 ได้เงินเดือนสูงกว่าปริญญาตรี จะบอกว่าเป็นนักวางแผนบุคคลในช่วงแรกแล้วค่อยหาประสบการณ์ไปสมัครบริษัทใหญ่ๆต่อไป ถ้าผมเป็นคนสัมภาษณ์ผมก็คงสงสัยในตัวคนนี้ว่าทำงานอะไร เงินเดือนแต่นี้ คุณค่าของงานจะแค่ไหน กับมูลค่าเดือนละ 5,800บาท เท่านั้น ซึ่งก็อาจจะทำให้เกิดข้อสงสัยเวลาสัมภาษณ์งาน


มองย้อนกลับไปหาหน่วยงานที่รับสมัครและรัฐบาล ทำไมถึงจ้างพนักงานวางแผนบุคลากรด้วยเงินเดือนที่ต่ำนัก ระยะยาวคงไม่มีใครอยากจะทำอาชีพนี้เพราะเงินเดือนน้อย เหมือนกับเหตุการณ์ที่เกิดขึ้นกับอาชีพครูในเมืองไทย ที่คนเก่งๆมักไม่อยากเป็นเพราะเงินเดือนน้อย รับผิดชอบเยอะ


มองในแง่เศรษฐศาสตร์ถือว่าขาดทุนอย่างมาก กว่าจะเรียนจาก ม.4 ถึงจบปริญญาตรี ต้องลงทุนไปเท่าไหร่ เสียทั้งเวลาอย่างน้อยเจ็ดปี


ฐานเงินเดือนของบ้านเรามันบิดไปหมดแล้วหรืออย่างไร
Read more »

Ghosts, Mediums, Psychics

Monday, August 17, 2009 0 comments
.
Hello +Bishop Sean. I would like to ask you, if I may, what your views are on ghosts? Also, what do you think of 'mediums' and psychics who attempt to contact spirits in haunted locations? Thank you and God bless, David Carter-Green.


What is a ghost? The disembodied soul of an otherwise dead person? The appearance of a deceased person or animal that manifests in either definable or blurry form? Apparitions that often appear suddenly and quickly, disappearing at a distance?
.
Spectres have certainly been sighted moving through physical barriers such as walls and doors and are often accompanied by a noticeable drop in temperature. Poltergeists are thought to be a form of ghost which takes energy from people, most often children or teenagers, and convert it into the ability to move solid objects. Poltergeists will allegedly announce their presence with rapping, or other noises, and generally create disorder. They apparently like to generate acts of mischief such as throwing furniture about. A ghost, ultimately, is believed by some to be the energy or soul of a living person. When we die, it is supposed, this energy is released from its corporeal shell and is believed to do one of two things: move to a higher spiritual place according to the individual's religious beliefs, or stay behind and linger earthbound for an unspecified time. Why ghosts linger is never satisfactorily explained, but the most popular theories include unfinished business, the need for closure and to say farewell, a wrongful death, or perhaps to communicate a warning.
.
Ghosts are allegedly photographed, videotaped and recorded on audio devices. It does seem, however, to be their choice and not ours. It has been claimed that ghosts can be detected with devices such as EMF detectors, thermal scanners, electrostatic detectors and tri-field meters. Ghosts may make themselves visible to the living from time to time, but I often wonder if what we are seeing is always the apparition of a dead person? Ghost lights have nevertheless been seen and recorded in every country and civilisation. These mysterious lights are usually seen as white or blue balls or yellow spheres (though occasionally as flickering candle flames) glowing in the darkness. Some scientists have suggested that the lights are caused by swamp gas, electricity, magnetism, or some phosphorescent material; yet so far no definitive natural source has ever been discovered for the sightings. There have been attempts to trap a ghost light for examination, but, pursued, they invariably always seem to be just out of reach. They acquired the name ignis fatuus, meaning "foolish fire," because it is thought foolish to try to follow or capture such a phantom light. According to certain legends, the light of an ignis fatuus is the ghost of a sinner who is condemned to wander the world for eternity. In parts of Britain, it is sometimes called the will-o'-the-wisp and is considered to be a death omen.
.
I tend toward scepticism where the majority of recorded sightings of supposed discarnate spirits are concerned, but, as with all things thought to be supernatural, retain an open mind. Some apparitions, I suspect, might be the original scene occuring in its own time and, of course, the same space with the imprint somehow managing to be eerily glimpsed in our time due to circumstances that enable a "time window" into the past which we do not fully comprehend. This has nothing to do with the supernatural, as I would define it, and is preternatural, by which I mean it is most likely to be understood scientifically at some point in the future. Could the surviving emotional memory of someone who has died traumatically and tragically, but is unaware of having become deceased, be another explanation? They may appear confused or frightened. Not being ready or yet able to let go of the physical attachments, they remain in the old and familiar places, repeating the same acts indefinitely until something or someone breaks the cycle for them. The theories are seemingly endless and, needless to say, spectres attributed to the dead might actually be demonic entities masquerading as loved ones.
.
My view on mediumship is the scriptural one; certainly mediums who prey upon the vulnerable and charge money for their "gift." A gift, by its nature, is something given and received freely.
.
One needs to define "psychics" before I can opine because some are mistakenly confused with mediums. I am considered psychic, for example, as are a great many people. This is by no means a voluntary condition. I, therefore, define a psychic as having the ability to receive information in ways other then the normal five senses. This is something the psychic cannot control, but might be able to develop.
.
Professional "psychics" who charge money for their supposed "gift" is a practice I would unreservedly condemn. Mediums and psychics who attempt to contact spirits at haunted locations are also to be discouraged and, to my mind, are playing a most dangerous game. Should anything supernatural manifest there is every possibility of it being demonic. Those who summon such entities would not necessarily be equipped to deal with what they unleash when unlocking doors best left closed.
.
Read more »

From DNA to Demons

Friday, August 14, 2009 0 comments
.
Good morning, Bishop. I have some queries for you: 1. Have you ever had DNA testing to verify your claim that you are descended from Lord Byron? 2. Can you name any other members of the World Union of Vampirologists? 3. Did you receive any payment for your article, "The Kirklees Vampire" for "The Unexplained"? 4. Do you use any other usernames online? If so, what are they? 5. How many vampires have you dispatched in the "ancient and approved manner"? 6. Have you given anyone any authorisation to talk on your behalf, on the Internet? If so, who? 7. What are your thoughts on Matthew 5: 39-44? 8. Do you disapprove of my username, "The Overseer", and, if so, do you approve of its use by a VRS member who appropriated it "in protest"? 9. In the first edition of "The Highgate Vampire" (1985), why was there no disclosure that the photographic depictions of Luisa were actually those of a model? And, why did you choose to employ a model to recreate "scenes" with Luisa, in the first place? 10. In 1973, you founded the Ordo Sancti Graal. Yet, in the first edition of "The Highgate Vampire" (1985), you refer to yourself as "not pre-eminently religious" and "a secular person handling consecrated material as a protection against hostile psychic forces, I am practicing 'white magic'." What happened in the gap between you founding a Christian order and engaging in the occult (like the necromantic summoning of Luisa, as detailed in the same book)? - Anthony Hogg.



1) The claim that I am connected to the poet by blood is not mine; it is that of my forebears, supported by Byron scholars, chief among whom is Professor Leslie A Marchand (see Acknowledgements in Mad, Bad and Dangerous to Know). Their claim is my legacy. Quite obviously I have not had DNA testing carried out because when last Lord Byron was exhumed for inspection I was not yet born, coupled with the fact that the seventh Lord Byron (successor to the title upon the death of the poet), George Anson Byron, while a cousin, is not the sixth Lord's progeny and George Anson Byron's successors, therefore, are not directly descended from the poet.

2) It is not my place to publicly identify members of any group or organisation. It is for members to identify themselves if they so wish. I will not take that choice away from them.

3) I was commissioned to write the article in The Unexplained by Orbis Publishing. Like any article, it was edited and amended for reasons of space and impact by those at Orbis. A fee would have been offered, as is customary when a commission is made. I was not the beneficiery. Any sum would have been donated to Ecclesia Apostolica Jesu Christi.

4) Not so as to appear anonymous. My identity would always be clear even if I employ a title which does not include my name in it. One username, for example, is "Apostle of Jesus Christ."

5) I would not want to get involved in just how many have been encountered by me and my colleagues for obvious reasons. Avoiding wherever possible the media in all its forms to ensure confidentiality to those who need help and whose help and co-operation is sought has allowed the ministry for dealing with such demonic molestation to become increasingly effective over the decades. Suffice that a world famous case was written about over the last four decades where media intrusion was impossible to prevent. Innumerable film documentaries have been made about it and there have been televised dramatisations in countries other than my own. The film rights to my bestselling book The Highgate Vampire are optioned for a cinema movie with a British cast (not to be confused with a small budget, unrelated project currently in pre-production with an American cast, which has hijacked and exploited the title of my book). Surely that is enough to satisfy most aficionados? There would have been no justification in repeating the unavoidable process of media co-operation applicable in the Highgate case over and again. By not discussing subsequent cases and by not exposing private people to a limelight they would certainly not welcome, my colleagues and I have been able to continue to operate with a reputation which precedes us for keeping confidences and not compromising people and places. Almost forty years after that first case was both reported and sensationalised by the media, I am still being asked to discuss it. While remaining open to debating the topic generally, I try to avoid the particular when it comes to unpublicised incidents and cases; having resolved not to allow investigations in the wake of Highgate to become similarly blighted. Mention of Kirklees Park and Abney Park in subsequent years was academic due to these already being in the public domain owing to the discussion of vampire-like spectres by others. Had that talk not already been made public, nothing would have been heard from me on the matter.

6) Nobody is authorised to speak in my stead. This does not preclude friends and associates coming to my defence, which choice is theirs to make and not mine to deny.

7) Without wanting to take this passage out of context from the entirety of what Jesus Christ is recorded as having said, I feel it nonetheless crucial for those who follow Him. It is one of the reasons I have always opposed the just war theory and have found myself unable to countenance its adoption by the overwhelming majority of church denominations since its formulation by Augustine and development by Thomas Aquinas (see pages 84-86 and 112-113 of The Grail Church).

8) No.

9) Given the outcome, it would have been inappropriate to have done anything else. That particular edition was published just three years after the case had been finally closed. It is made clear in the text that "Lusia" is a pseudonym.

10) This is what I actually wrote: "Although not pre-eminently religious, I have been left in no doubt by the course of events that evil is not just an abstract force and, most important of all, that such demonic molestation as I have encountered is no match for divine power once invoked." I stand by what I wrote. I find it neither incompatible with my founding Ordo Sancti Graal, nor my later taking holy orders; though, of course, I was not in holy orders at the time. I have known many pre-eminently religious people throughout my life and do not count myself among them. I neither belong to a monastic order, nor am I imbued with the ideals of churchianity (see From Satan To Christ and The Grail Church). If I am to be pre-eminently anything it would be "spiritual," not "religious." I identify with early Christians more than I do with their successors and have more in common with Christian mystics than the establishment. "All attempts to present Jesus Christ as a pillar of law and order, or of the establishment, have failed. He was the outsider, the social deviant, in conflict with state, temple and social order; holding them in disregard or combating their demands (The Grail Church, page 84)." The Catholic Church is frequently described as practising white magic when transusbstantiation takes place during Mass. The word "magic" means using the supernatural to cause an effect, or, at least, that is the definition I was applying when I talk in my book about "handling consecrated material as a protection against hostile psychic forces" to form a "ritualised barrier." In the same paragraph I make abundantly clear: "I am not a witch in any sense of the word" and "The set of symbols I work with are predominantly Christian." A protective circle is not a Christian symbol per se, but I nevertheless liken it to a church which, too, offers sanctuary. Every exorcist engages in the summoning of demons. Vampires/demons are not the dead. They might masquerade as such, but they are not God's true dead. Hence the act of summoning a demonic manifestation for the purpose of its banishment is not the occult art of necromancy, but rather the Christian practice of exorcism. Necromancy is divination by raising the spirits of the dead. The word derives from the Greek necros (“dead”) and manteia (“divination”). Strabo referred to necromancy as the principal form of divination among the people of Persia, specifically widespread amongst the Sabians. The Babylonian necromancers were called Manzazuu or Sha’etemmu and the spirits they raised were called Etemmu. Some might argue that Jesus Christ's raising of Lazarus from the dead is a prima facie case of necromancy; though I would postulate no such argument; and He, too, was accused by his detractors of being a magician for engaging the supernatural to cause effects, ie miracles, especially exorcisms.

Read more »

Ironic Byronic Archetype

Thursday, August 13, 2009 0 comments
.
Dear Bishop Manchester, I'm a university student with a great appreciation for your work and writings. As many of my studies deal with the supernatural, I would love to pose a few questions to you -- particularly regarding Lord Byron -- simply for my own knowledge. I am an ardent lover of Byron and even hope to visit his grave this January, but in my research of him I find many references that would suggest that he had some involvement with vampires, or that he himself was a vampire. I refer not only to his literature and the odd description of his habits provided by Dr. Polidori, but his personal diaries where he refers to the unquenchable thirst and being haunted by those who are neither living nor dead. I dare even site you as possible evidence to Byron’s involvement with vampires, as I understand many cultures believe that the living descendants of vampires have a special ability to hunt them. What, if any, was Byron’s involvement with actual vampires, in his home country or abroad, or what is your opinion on the theory that he had intercourse with these creatures, if he was not one himself? I thank you kindly for anything you have to say on the matter. With deepest respect, Jordan Andrea, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.



Lord Byron, parodied as Lord Ruthven by John William Polidori in The Vampyre (1819), fortuitously crystallised an archetypal image that is centuries strong; yet he abhorred the vampire almost to the same extent as do I.

John William Polidori (7 September 1795 - 24 August 1821) is credited by some as the creator of the vampire genre of fantasy fiction. Polidori was the oldest son of Gaetano Polidori, an Italian political émigré, and Anna Maria Pierce, a governess. He had three brothers and four sisters and was one of the first pupils at Ampleforth College. Polidori began his schooling in 1804 shortly after the monks, in exile from France, settled in the lodge of Anne Fairfax's chaplain in the Ampleforth Valley. He went on from Ampleforth in 1810 to Edinburgh University, where he received his degree as a doctor of medicine on 1 August 1815 at the age of nineteen.
.
In 1816, Dr Polidori entered Lord Byron's service as his personal physician, and accompanied Byron on a trip through Europe. At the Villa Diodati, a house Byron rented by Lake Geneva in Switzerland, the pair met with Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, and her husband-to-be Percy Bysshe Shelley, and their companion Claire Clairmont.
.
One night in June, after the company had read aloud from the Tales of the Dead, a collection of horror tales, Byron suggested that they each write a ghost story. Mary Shelley worked on a tale that would later evolve into Frankenstein. Byron wrote (and quickly abandoned) a fragment of a story, which Polidori used later as the basis for his own tale.
.
Rather than use the crude, bestial vampire of folklore as a basis for his story, Polidori based his character on Byron. Polidori named the character "Lord Ruthven" as a joke. The name was originally used in Lady Caroline Lamb's novel Glenarvon, in which a thinly-disguised Byron figure was also named Lord Ruthven.
.
Polidori's Lord Ruthven was not only the first vampire in English fiction, but was the first fictional vampire in the form we recognise today - an aristocratic fiend who preyed among high society.
.
Polidori's story, The Vampyre, was published in the April 1819 issue of New Monthly Magazine. Much to both his and Byron's chagrin, The Vampyre was released as a new work by Byron. The poet even released his own Fragment of a Novel in an attempt to clear up the mess, but, for better or worse, The Vampyre continued to be attributed to him.
.
Dismissed by Byron, Polidori returned to England, and in 1820 wrote to the Prior at Ampleforth; his letter is lost, but Prior Burgess' reply makes it clear that he considered Polidori, with his scandalous literary acquaintances, an unsuitable case for the monastic profession.
.
In 1821, after writing an ambitious sacred poem, The Fall of the Angels, Polidori, suffering from depression, died in mysterious circumstances on 24 August 1821 at approximately 1:10pm, probably by self-administered poison, though the coroner's verdict was that he had "departed this Life in a natural way by the visitation of God."
.
Polidori's fate has been to be remembered only as a footnote in Romantic history. Reprints of the diary he kept during his travels with Byron are available, but are rather hard to find for purchase on the internet.
.
Polidori's diary, titled The Diary of John Polidori, edited by William Michael Rossetti, was first published in 1911 by Elkin Mathews (London). A reprint of this book, The Diary of Dr John William Polidori, 1816, relating to Byron, Shelley etc was published by Folcroft Library Editions (Folcroft, Pa.) in 1975. Another reprint by the same title was printed by Norwood Editions (Norwood, Pa.) in 1978.
.
As well as being mid-wife to Frankenstein's monster, he was uncle to Dante Gabriel Rossetti and Christina Rossetti.
.
Three films have depicted John Polidori and the genesis of the Frankenstein and The Vampyre stories in 1816: Gothic directed by Ken Russell (1986), Haunted Summer directed by Ivan Passer (1988) and Remando al viento (English title: Rowing with the Wind) directed by Gonzalo Suárez (1988).
.


I have written about Lord Byron extensively in my book Mad, Bad and Dangerous to Know. I do not believe for a moment that the poet was involved with vampires or that he fell victim to one. In this work, however, I touch on the haunting of Lady Caroline Lamb at Brocket Hall. Some have suggested that Lady Caroline Lamb might have been a vampire, but having researched all the evidence about her life and death thoroughly, and having visited her almost forgotten tomb many times, I can find nothing to support this notion. There is an illustrated plan of the Byron vault at Hucknall Torkard plus a close-up photograph of his and his daughter's coffins (taken when the vault was opened for Byron's exhumation in 1938) in my book. The description I provide of the poet's body as it appeared seventy-one years ago and what occurred to it immediately after his death in 1824, leaves little room for any theory about vampirism taking root.
.

.
Read more »

Labels

Followers

Powered by Blogger.
My Ping in TotalPing.com